<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drupal 7 Views: Making a block of links to related pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billauer.se/blog/2011/07/d7-sql-views-taxonomy-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2011/07/d7-sql-views-taxonomy-tags/</link>
	<description>Anything I found worthy to write down.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pitcairn</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2011/07/d7-sql-views-taxonomy-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pitcairn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=1358#comment-762</guid>
		<description>... and doing so allows a secondary alphabetical sort by title to work (so items with the same relevance are sorted alphabetically) whereas the views_php solution somehow prevents that. Note I am using a recent views dev version, 7.x-3.3+30-dev.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and doing so allows a secondary alphabetical sort by title to work (so items with the same relevance are sorted alphabetically) whereas the views_php solution somehow prevents that. Note I am using a recent views dev version, 7.x-3.3+30-dev.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pitcairn</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2011/07/d7-sql-views-taxonomy-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pitcairn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=1358#comment-761</guid>
		<description>Revisit: I&#039;ve found that an agregated sort of COUNT(Taxonomy term: name) (desc) works, avoiding the need for views_php.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revisit: I&#8217;ve found that an agregated sort of COUNT(Taxonomy term: name) (desc) works, avoiding the need for views_php.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pitcairn</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2011/07/d7-sql-views-taxonomy-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pitcairn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=1358#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Great run-through, thanks. The sorting tip is especially valuable. 

I agree that it&#039;s often difficult to get what you want out of the views UI even though you could write the equivalent SQL yourself in a few minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great run-through, thanks. The sorting tip is especially valuable. </p>
<p>I agree that it&#8217;s often difficult to get what you want out of the views UI even though you could write the equivalent SQL yourself in a few minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
