<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hierarchies in Orcad schematics: Please, don&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billauer.se/blog/2015/12/orcad-pcb-hierarchy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2015/12/orcad-pcb-hierarchy/</link>
	<description>Anything I found worthy to write down.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas PERRIN</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2015/12/orcad-pcb-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas PERRIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 09:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=4868#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>Orcad way of naming net is pretty straightforward in herarchical designs.
Net name can come from upper level.
If there is a conflict, net is renamed NAME_INSTANCENAME

You can find PCB nets in schematics by searching by flat nets.

Sometimes in my schematics, the same page is used 16 times. In this case having a hierarchical schematic is a must.
It helps also to have consistency accros schematics and it facilitate schematic page reuse.
I would not live without hierarchical design :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orcad way of naming net is pretty straightforward in herarchical designs.<br />
Net name can come from upper level.<br />
If there is a conflict, net is renamed NAME_INSTANCENAME</p>
<p>You can find PCB nets in schematics by searching by flat nets.</p>
<p>Sometimes in my schematics, the same page is used 16 times. In this case having a hierarchical schematic is a must.<br />
It helps also to have consistency accros schematics and it facilitate schematic page reuse.<br />
I would not live without hierarchical design :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Clarke</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2015/12/orcad-pcb-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>David Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=4868#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>Mmm, we are going the other way.
Dx to Orcad, which does not look good to me.

The only way to create hierarchy is top-down.  If you have the right tools, they will add hierarchy ports with the correct name as you add the connections.  Push down and the job&#039;s a good&#039;un.

Good point about navigating PDFs.  I hate them.
It would help a lot if the PDF printer added the page number to each hierarchy block, but then that would be far too hard to automate, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm, we are going the other way.<br />
Dx to Orcad, which does not look good to me.</p>
<p>The only way to create hierarchy is top-down.  If you have the right tools, they will add hierarchy ports with the correct name as you add the connections.  Push down and the job&#8217;s a good&#8217;un.</p>
<p>Good point about navigating PDFs.  I hate them.<br />
It would help a lot if the PDF printer added the page number to each hierarchy block, but then that would be far too hard to automate, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Anderson</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2015/12/orcad-pcb-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 01:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=4868#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>So true!  And if you think it&#039;s bad in Orcad, pray you never get forced to use (x)DxDesigner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true!  And if you think it&#8217;s bad in Orcad, pray you never get forced to use (x)DxDesigner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
