<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: udev, the &#8220;authorized&#8221; attribute and other failed attempts to ban a bogus USB keyboard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billauer.se/blog/2023/04/usb-webcam-keyboard-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2023/04/usb-webcam-keyboard-ban/</link>
	<description>Anything I found worthy to write down.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: irseny</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2023/04/usb-webcam-keyboard-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>irseny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=6823#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>I had a somewhat related situation with an annoying joystick on a mouse that I wanted to make inaccessible. rm $devnode seems dirty. Your article helped me notice that  72-... is the right spot to put a TAG-=&quot;uaccess&quot; rule. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a somewhat related situation with an annoying joystick on a mouse that I wanted to make inaccessible. rm $devnode seems dirty. Your article helped me notice that  72-&#8230; is the right spot to put a TAG-=&#8221;uaccess&#8221; rule. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eli</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2023/04/usb-webcam-keyboard-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=6823#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>You seem to have a point there. I ran this whole thing on a very old distribution. And I did this almost a year ago.

So next time, if there will be any, I&#039;ll try your suggestion. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to have a point there. I ran this whole thing on a very old distribution. And I did this almost a year ago.</p>
<p>So next time, if there will be any, I&#8217;ll try your suggestion. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irseny</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2023/04/usb-webcam-keyboard-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>irseny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=6823#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE is probably not used in libinput-device-group (looking at my 80-libinput-device-groups.rules)
Maybe add 
ENV{LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE}==&quot;1&quot;, GOTO=&quot;libinput_device_group_end&quot;
before the call. It made my mouse ignored in X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE is probably not used in libinput-device-group (looking at my 80-libinput-device-groups.rules)<br />
Maybe add<br />
ENV{LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE}==&#8221;1&#8243;, GOTO=&#8221;libinput_device_group_end&#8221;<br />
before the call. It made my mouse ignored in X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eli</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2023/04/usb-webcam-keyboard-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=6823#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly what I tried with 79-no-camera-keyboard.rules, which is shown later on in the post. But that didn&#039;t work either, not clear why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what I tried with 79-no-camera-keyboard.rules, which is shown later on in the post. But that didn&#8217;t work either, not clear why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irseny</title>
		<link>https://billauer.se/blog/2023/04/usb-webcam-keyboard-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>irseny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 08:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://billauer.se/blog/?p=6823#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>Hi,

very interesting read. I did not 100% follow through the LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE fail however. Would you not be able to create a rule that triggers earlier than  80-libinput-device-groups.rules and filter by vendor/product ID if the name was not available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>very interesting read. I did not 100% follow through the LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE fail however. Would you not be able to create a rule that triggers earlier than  80-libinput-device-groups.rules and filter by vendor/product ID if the name was not available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
